For sell-side advisors and deal counsel
Verify the data room at source — and prove every figure later.
doloop extracts the figures and checks the clauses in your deal documents — and refuses when it can't prove an answer. Every result points to the exact page and box it came from, and reruns to the same output two years later, in front of a regulator or an opposing party.
No model on the answers you sign off on · no per-answer variance · a trail an indemnity dispute can stand on
The problem you already feel
The numbers you must trust are the ones nobody has time to check.
A data room now holds more pages than any team can read end to end. Financials, contracts, cap tables, disclosure schedules — the documents have outrun the people checking them. The common fix is an AI assistant that answers with a citation. But a citation only tells you where an answer claims to come from. It doesn't tell you the answer will be the same on the next run, that the number was read correctly, or that you can defend it in a dispute. An AI that won't repeat its own answer can't be the thing you tie out against.
What doloop does differently
It reads the room four ways. Each answer is exact, repeatable, and tied to the source.
If it can't be proven from the documents, it says so — it doesn't invent an answer. And the answers you sign off on come from parsing and rules, not from a model writing the number.
Find it
"Where does the room address change-of-control?"
Points you to the exact document and page, every time — or refuses when the room doesn't cover it.
Check the clauses
"Is this representation identical everywhere it appears?"
Shows whether a clause is the same across every document — and the exact word where it drifted. A match or an exact diff, never a similarity score.
Pull the numbers
"Give me this schedule, and prove each figure."
Extracts every cell with a pointer to its box on the page. You verify it on screen before you ever export it — no separate reconciliation pass.
Benchmarked on 2,332 cells from scanned, real filings: every value checked against the source — zero read wrong, identical on every rerun. (Whether a cell is ever silently missed is the one axis we're still measuring — see below.)Know the document
"What is this, and what are its parts?"
Recognizes the document and its sections, so the right answer comes from the right place — learned once, then applied as a hard rule.
On the roadmap — shown as concept, not yet shipped.
The proof
One changed word, surfaced exactly.
The clause reads the same to a tired eye at 2 a.m. It isn't — and that single word is what a dispute turns on.
Same input, same result, every run — so a finding is reproducible two years after close, in front of whoever is asking. That reproducibility is the difference between a citation and evidence.
Two kinds of answer — and you always know which
The tool never dresses a guess as a fact.
The answer you can sign off on
Exact, repeatable, traced to source. Use it for tie-out, disclosure schedules, and anything that has to hold up.
The answer to think with
When the room can't prove something and you still want a view, you can ask for an unverified draft answer — clearly marked. Use it to explore, never to sign off.
That line — proven on one side, flagged on the other — is the whole point. A citation-based assistant gives you only the second kind, dressed as the first.
Why it compounds
It gets sharper with every deal.
When your team corrects something — or confirms a draft answer was right — that judgment is kept and applied next time: checked, recorded, and auditable. The questions the tool answers with certainty grow deal over deal, while everything it reports stays traceable to its source. Every correction your team makes speeds the next deal — and never leaves your firm.
Provenance, consistency, and provable answers across the room — the same way every time.
An exception, a house convention, a confirmed draft answer. The judgment, captured once.
Recorded, applied to every deal after — and never shared outside your firm.
See it run
A real report, on real filings.
All three readers, run on the real Twitter / X EDGAR merger filings, in one self-contained report: every financial cell either extracted or flagged in amber as unreadable — nothing hidden — every clause checked for drift, and each question answered from the filings themselves or refused. Nothing left the machine that produced it.
It runs on the deal's own documents, so the answers come from the filings. Want it on yours? That's the design-partner conversation below.
What we don't claim
The honest fence.
We'd rather you trust the boundary than oversell past it. Three things we're explicit about:
- On the financial tables, we stand behind every extracted value and an identical rerun. What we're still measuring: whether a cell can ever be skipped without flagging it.
- The "know the document" step is on our roadmap, shown above as concept — not yet shipped. And the "find it" depth on your deal depends on setting it up on your documents first, a short attended step we do with you.
- We haven't yet proven this closes deals faster or catches more on a live deal — that's exactly what we're establishing with a design partner, on real diligence.
Where it fits first
Financial tie-out and disclosure-schedule preparation.
The work where a wrong number carries real liability, and a junior team spends most of its hours cross-checking figures against source. doloop does that checking at the source, the first time, and produces the trail you'd have built by hand. The result you keep is one you can stand behind long after the deal closes.
Design partners
Verify your next data room with us.
We're taking on a small number of design partners — M&A counsel and sell-side advisors who run a real verification pass and want it deterministic, defensible, and compounding. We set it up on your documents and run it alongside your team on a live deal, under NDA.